Mile markers are not accurate, show up 100m or more behind the actual distance
kdunn87 says:
2015-01-08 13:36:31
I've lately been noticing some weird things happening with mile markers. One day I mapped a route for a tempo run and took note of the mile markers (street intersections), then came back a few months later and the mile markers on the same route had changed.
Today, I looked closely as I incrementally mapped a route and noticed that the mile marker icons are showing up about 115m behind the actual distance of each mile. Any ideas why this is happening and if there is a more accurate way to use the system? I've been using this program for 8 years and hope it hasn't been malfunctioning the entire time! Obviously 115 meters will throw off mile splits significantly.
sdrouin says:
2015-02-23 22:54:06
This issue has been added to the list of bugs to fix. Thanks for letting us know!
I've lately been noticing some weird things happening with mile markers. One day I mapped a route for a tempo run and took note of the mile markers (street intersections), then came back a few months later and the mile markers on the same route had changed.
Today, I looked closely as I incrementally mapped a route and noticed that the mile marker icons are showing up about 115m behind the actual distance of each mile. Any ideas why this is happening and if there is a more accurate way to use the system? I've been using this program for 8 years and hope it hasn't been malfunctioning the entire time! Obviously 115 meters will throw off mile splits significantly.
This issue has been added to the list of bugs to fix. Thanks for letting us know!